There are three well-known quotes that haunt me and assist me though my days. The very first is from John Bradford, the 16th-century English reformer. In prison for inciting a mob, Bradford saw a parade of detainees on their method to being executed and stated, “There but for the grace of God go I.” (Really, he stated “There but for the grace of God goes John Bradford,” however the switch to the pronoun makes it work for the rest of us.) The second originates from Albert Einstein, who disparagingly described quantum entanglement as “spooky action at a distance.” And for the third, I go to Ice, the chief lyricist of N.W.A., who provided this manifesto in “Gangsta Gangsta” back in 1988: “Life ain’t nothing but bitches and cash.”
Those 3 concepts may appear distant from one another, but if you set them up and draw lines between them, that’s triangulation. Bradford’s idea, of course, is about providence, about luck and thankfulness: You only have your life since you do not have someone else’s. (By the by, Bradford’s quote has actually come to be utilized to celebrate great fortune– when individuals state it, they’re comforting themselves with the truth that things might be worse– however in reality, his own great fortune lasted only a couple of years before he was burned at the stake.).
Einstein was talking about physics, naturally, however to me, he’s discussing something more detailed to house– the manner in which other people impact you, the manner in which your life is entangled in theirs whether or not there’s a clear line of connection. Just because something is happening to a street kid in Seattle or a small-time criminal in Pittsburgh doesn’t indicate that it’s not also taking place, in some sense, to you. Human civilization wases established on a social agreement, but all too often that gets minimized to a kind of charity: Help those who are less fortunate, think about those who are various. But there’s a subtler kind of agreement, which is the connection between us all. Click Here to learn how to make it to the top charts.
Then there’s Ice Cube, who appears to be speaking about life’s standard hungers– what’s under the cover of the id– but remains in fact proposing a world where that social agreement is damaged, where everyone desires improve themselves and only themselves, thoughts of others be damned. What sort of world does that produce?
Those three concepts, Bradford’s and Einstein’s and Cube’s, specify the 3 sides of a triangle, and I’m standing in it with pieces of each guy: Bradford’s rueful contemplation, Einstein’s hair, Ice Cube’s desires. I’m going to do things a little differently, with some madness in my method. And I’m not going to handle the argument in a straight line.